For Engineering & Building Design

Documentation-grade project control.

Engineering and building design firms run on utilisation, QA discipline and coordination. TrackerPlus shows loading before it burns, routes documents through named QA reviewers, and keeps every consultant and RFI on one list instead of in your engineers’ heads.

Loading visible before it burns QA is a gate, not a hope RFIs answered once, on the record
TrackerPlus / Staff Loading

Staff Loading

Over scheduledUnder scheduledOn targetOff (weekend, holiday, leave)
Staff Jul 2026
Mon
13
Tue
14
Wed
15
Thu
16
Fri
17
A. Nguyen
8h 45m
7h 30m
6h
7h 30m
3h 30m
M. Okafor
7h 30m
9h 15m
7h 30m
7h 30m
L. Rossi
7h 30m
7h 30m
8h 30m
5h
S. Haddad
10h
7h 30m
7h 30m
7h 30m
8h
J. Fournier
4h 15m
7h 30m
7h 30m
6h 30m
The loading heatmap — every engineer’s coming weeks, from real task estimates
Sound familiar?

What quietly costs documentation firms.

Utilisation is a rear-view mirror

You find out someone was overloaded when the timesheets land — two weeks after the deadline slipped and the overtime was burned.

QA by hallway conversation

“Did anyone check the door schedule?” When review lives in memory instead of a gate, the answer is discovered on site.

Consultants chased from memory

Waiting on structural. Waiting on civil. Every engineer keeps their own mental list of who owes what, and things fall through anyway.

Plan & Schedule

See loading before it burns.

The heatmap builds itself from task estimates and assignments — every person, week by week. Overloads show up while there is still time to move work, not in next month’s timesheet review.

  • Loading computed from the same estimates the fee was priced on
  • Spot the overloaded week before it becomes overtime
  • Rebalance by moving tasks — the heatmap updates live
Explore Plan & Schedule
TrackerPlus / Staff Loading

Staff Loading

Over scheduledUnder scheduledOn targetOff (weekend, holiday, leave)
Staff Jul 2026
Mon
13
Tue
14
Wed
15
Thu
16
Fri
17
A. Nguyen
8h 45m
7h 30m
6h
7h 30m
3h 30m
M. Okafor
7h 30m
9h 15m
7h 30m
7h 30m
L. Rossi
7h 30m
7h 30m
8h 30m
5h
S. Haddad
10h
7h 30m
7h 30m
7h 30m
8h
J. Fournier
4h 15m
7h 30m
7h 30m
6h 30m
Design & Review

QA is a gate, not a hope.

Sets move through drafter check, internal QA and final review as explicit gates with named reviewers. A sheet under review locks to its reviewer, and review notes stay held until they hand back — the system holds them, not the hallway.

  • Named QA stages with per-sheet status
  • Open comments counted per sheet, and pre-ticked on every hand-back
  • The review trail survives staff changes and years
Explore Design & Review
TrackerPlus / QA Gates
Drafter
Review
Final
A-201 · GAComplete
DrafterAuthor self-check· M. Okafor
Passed
  • Title block current
  • Grid & levels correct
  • Dimensions & annotations placed
ReviewSenior QA pass· A. Nguyen
Passed
  • Code compliance checked
  • Coordination clash-free
  • Legible at issue scale
FinalPrincipal release· D. Kefeng
Passed
  • Principal sign-off
  • Issue register clear
  • Ready to issue
Clients & Consultants

Consultants chased from one list.

Every consultant’s outstanding items live on one list with fee status, logged calls and follow-up reminders. Set the reminder once and it lands back on your engineer’s dashboard, inbox or Slack — nothing waits silently for six weeks.

  • One register of what every consultant owes, per project
  • Chase-ups and reminders fire on schedule, not on memory
  • The full comms history in one place when disputes arrive
Explore Clients & Consultants
TrackerPlus / Consultants
Ridge StructuralStructural
★★★★★
On time
Lumen ServicesServices / MEP
★★★☆☆
Slow · chasing
Terraform CivilCivil
★★★★☆
On time
New communication · Lumen Services Slow · chasing
13 Jul 2026 Set Reminder
14 Jul 2026
09:00
J. Okafor
DashboardEmailSlack
Chase Lumen Services for the structural services fee proposal.
CancelSave
Reminder 14 Jul at 9:00am Sent

Chase Lumen Services for the structural services fee proposal.

J. Okafor · Dashboard, Email · marked sent

Tenders & Contractors

RFIs answered once, as addendums.

Contractor questions land in the tender portal, and AI drafts the addendum from your answer — issued to every bidder at once, on the record. No more answering the same question four times in four inboxes.

  • RFIs numbered per tender and tracked from open to answered
  • AI-drafted addendums from your answers, issued to all bidders
  • A clean document register when the job goes to contract
Explore Tenders & Contractors
TrackerPlus / RFIs & Addendums

RFI-014: Fire rating to Level 1 slab

New Linked Answered

From: 5 contractors · same question

Linked RFIs

This RFI is linked to: RFI-018, RFI-022, RFI-031, RFI-047

Answering this RFI will also answer all linked RFIs with the same response.

Response

The Level 1 slab requires a 90/90/90 FRL. Refer to revised drawing A-101 Rev C and Addendum 03 for the compliant detail.
12345 5 recipients · resolved

ADD-03: Fire-rating clarification

Final

Issued by A. Nguyen on 13 Jul 2026

Claude rewrites the linked RFI responses into a formal addendum — referencing your Conditions of Tender — then it's issued, with every contractor acknowledgement logged.

Claude · Opus 3 of 5 acknowledged
0%
Of loading from real estimates
0
Review notes lost in the hallway
0
List of who owes you what
0x
Checked: drafter then reviewer
For engineering & building design

Discipline you can point at.

Loading, QA, consultants and RFIs — run as systems, not habits. Start free — your first two seats are free forever — or walk through the demo studio first.