Every project. Every number. Watched.
Past twenty people, no principal can hold every project in their head — so TrackerPlus does. An intelligence layer scores every client channel it watches, audits your own data for quiet inconsistencies, and scales the admin that used to scale with headcount.
AI Channel Monitoring Report
Each message scored by four models — ranked by severity.
- ClientRiverside House · 9 Jul · 4:12 pmWe were expecting the DA set on Friday. Can you confirm where it’s at?GPT-5.5 Thinkingcritical
A committed date was missed; the client is now chasing.
Claude Opus 4.8criticalMissed deadline + a direct chase — the relationship is heating.
Gemini 3.1 ProconcernFollow-up on an overdue deliverable; tone still measured.
Gemini 3.5 FlashconcernChasing a late set — worth a same-day reply.
- ClientDocklands Fitout · 9 Jul · 11:38 amThat’s the third time we’ve gone back and forth on this same detail…GPT-5.5 Thinkingconcern
Repetition and friction — the client feels unheard.
Claude Opus 4.8concernRepeated rework on one detail; a cue to close it out.
Gemini 3.1 ProwatchMild frustration at back-and-forth, not yet escalated.
Gemini 3.5 FlashwatchSome impatience; keep an eye on the thread.
- ClientCoastal Pavilion · 8 Jul · 5:03 pmNo worries at all, whenever you get a chance — no rush from us.GPT-5.5 Thinkingwatch
Second soft deferral this week — polite, but cooling.
Claude Opus 4.8concernReads as disengagement rather than patience.
Gemini 3.1 ProsafeTaken at face value — genuinely relaxed.
Gemini 3.5 FlashsafePositive, no action needed.
Whole-channel holistic rating (0–100), four models compared.
- critical · 86/100Riverside House #24-018#riverside-house · 214 messagesClaude Opus 4.886primaryGPT-5.5 Thinking82Gemini 3.1 Pro74Gemini 3.5 Flash71
Client chased the DA set twice this week and the last two replies ran terse. A committed date was missed — the relationship is cooling.
- high · 58/100Docklands Fitout #24-031#docklands-fitout · 168 messagesClaude Opus 4.858primaryGPT-5.5 Thinking54Gemini 3.1 Pro41Gemini 3.5 Flash38
Repeated back-and-forth on a single detail is wearing thin. No missed dates yet, but the thread is trending warmer.
- medium · 44/100Coastal Pavilion #24-009#coastal-pavilion · 96 messagesClaude Opus 4.844primaryGPT-5.5 Thinking31Gemini 3.1 Pro22Gemini 3.5 Flash18
A third soft deferral this week. Opus reads disengagement where Flash reads patience — the split is itself the signal.
What scale quietly breaks.
Forty projects, five principals. The jobs that get attention are the loud ones — and the quiet ones drift until they’re suddenly loud.
An estimate edited after hours were logged. An invoiced entry quietly changed. At scale, small inconsistencies hide — until an audit finds them.
Pay runs, reconciliation, WIP reports — a week of every month goes to assembling numbers that a system should already hold.
AI reads every client channel so you read five.
Each project’s risk score is built from the signal that actually predicts trouble — how the client is talking to you — and the breakdown shows exactly why a job is flagged, model by model and team leader by team leader.
- Nightly scoring across every monitored client channel
- Model-by-model breakdown — no black-box verdicts
- Principals spend attention where the data points
Client chased the DA set twice this week and the last two replies ran terse. A committed date was missed and the relationship is cooling — worth a principal picking up the phone.
A committed DA date slipped and the client is now chasing directly. Two terse replies in a row read as a cooling relationship.
- J. Fielding71/100led 62% of the chatLed the block where the DA date was committed and then missed — most of the friction sits here.
- A. Nguyen48/100led 38% of the chatHandled early coordination cleanly; tone only warmed once the deadline was raised.
Agrees the missed date is the driver; flags the direct chase as an escalation the studio should answer same-day.
Reads the thread as high but recoverable — a prompt, dated reply likely resets the tone.
Lands a tier lower than Opus; the disagreement itself earns the channel a second look.
Silent audits on your own data.
Integrity checks watch for the inconsistencies that hide at scale — estimates changed after time was logged, invoiced entries edited, tasks written up after the work was done — and file findings with the evidence attached.
- Estimate and billing edits caught with their history
- Findings carry evidence, not accusations
- Trust your numbers before the auditor asks you to
Integrity Findings
Suspicious time-tracking behaviour flagged by the daily scan and assessed by Claude — estimates retro-fitted to logged time, edits to invoiced entries, and similar patterns.
Concept estimate raised 40h → 96h after 62% was already logged
The estimate was increased well after most of the hours were booked against it — the budget appears to have been refitted to the time already spent rather than set up front.
A non-round 37h estimate equals 37h logged exactly
An unusual exact match between a non-round estimate and the hours logged — worth a look, but a plausible coincidence on a small, well-scoped task.
Task created two hours after its own earliest time entry
The task was back-dated a couple of hours — consistent with a mid-session rename rather than manipulation.
Pay runs without the spreadsheet ritual.
Pay runs assemble from the records the studio already keeps — salary settings, approved overtime, reimbursements and leave — per person, reviewable, repeatable. The monthly spreadsheet ceremony and its copy-paste errors retire together.
- Pay runs built from approved records, not re-keyed data
- Per-person payslips generated from the run
- Leave and entitlements tracked in the same system
Pay Run · June 2026
No tax withheld| Staff | Earnings | Overtime | Net Pay | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Nguyen Project Architect | A$8,200 | +A$410 | A$8,698 | Paid |
M. Okafor Architect | £4,750 | — | £4,804 | Paid |
L. Rossi Technician · hourly | €3,960 | +€240 | €4,200 | Approved |
J. Fournier Junior Architect | $5,100 | — | $5,220 | Draft |
Every client, their own window.
Dozens of clients each get a portal scoped to exactly their projects — live progress, billing and published drawings, reading the same figures your billing produces. Transparency at scale, with margins structurally invisible.
- Per-client scoping enforced by one server-side rule
- Multi-organisation contacts filter by client, or see everything at once
- The figures can’t drift — portal and billing share a source
Select a Client
Your account has access to multiple clients. Choose which client you want to view, or view everything at once.
Run forty projects like you ran four.
An intelligence layer over every client channel, integrity checks over every number, and admin that stopped scaling with headcount. Start free, or walk through the demo studio.